Support substrate for separation membrane

ABSTRACT

A separation membrane support substrate comprising (1) a front layer having at least one layer comprising thermoplastic resin filaments with a single filament diameter of 7-30 μm; (2) a middle layer having at least one layer comprising melt blown fibers with a single fiber diameter of no greater than 5 μm, and a fiber basis weight of at least 1 g/m 2  and comprising no more than 30 wt % of the total fiber basis weight; (3) a back layer having at least one layer comprising thermoplastic resin filaments with a single filament diameter of 7-20 μm, and has a fiber basis weight of 3-40 g/m 2 ; (4) the laminated nonwoven fabric has an apparent density of 0.67-0.91 g/cm 3 ; and (5) the laminated nonwoven fabric has a thickness of 45-110 μm.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to a support substrate for a separationmembrane such as an ultrafiltration membrane or reverse osmosismembrane.

BACKGROUND ART

Filters used for ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis include spiraltypes wherein a flat separation membrane is coiled in spiral fashion,types wherein a plurality of hollow fiber separation membranes arearranged in parallel and tubular types wherein a flat separationmembrane is worked into a cylindrical shape, and all such types can beheld in a cartridge with a fixed volume for use.

Among such separation membranes, the flat separation membranes areproduced as sheets by coating a resin with a separating function onto asupport substrate such as a nonwoven fabric. The nonwoven fabric used asthe support substrate functions as a coating base for production of auniform film when the separation membrane is produced, while alsoperforming the basic function of strength maintenance to prevent ruptureof the separation membrane due to the pressure of the filtration mediumduring use. Therefore, a staple fiber wet laid nonwoven fabric is usedwhich can provide a high degree of uniformity.

In recent years, as such separation membranes have become more widelyused, an improvement in treatment efficiency, per cartridge, has alsobecome an important issue. Thinner separation membranes includingsupport substrates have therefore been desired, in order to maximize thenumber of separation membranes that can be placed in each cartridge andlower, the pressure loss of the separation membranes for an increasedflow volume.

In order to achieve thin, uniform coating films, the support substrateitself must be reduced in thickness while maintaining surface smoothnessand strength. However, when the amount of fiber is reduced to form athinner support substrate, the problem of “strike-through” can occurwhereby the resin seeps out from the back of the support substrateduring coating. The resin escaping from the back side of the supportsubstrate contaminates the film-forming apparatus and can cause defectsin a continuously formed separation membrane.

Also, although reducing the amount of fiber to form a thinner supportsubstrate increases the liquid permeability, it also results innoticeable thickness spots in the support substrate and more sectionssusceptible to “strike-through”. Another serious problem is reducedstrength and, particularly in the case of a staple fiber wet laidnonwoven fabric, reducing the amount of fiber results in a drasticreduction in strength. Methods exist for increasing the apparent densityto achieve thinner size but, as the fiber diameter (D) and fiber length(L) must have a ratio (L/D) within a specified range in order to achievea uniform dispersion to avoid tangling of the fibers in the wet laidstock solution, the fiber length must be shortened, thereby drasticallyreducing the strength of the nonwoven fabric.

In Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2002-095937 and U.S. Pat.No. 6,156,680 there are proposed methods of using low-crystallinepolyethylene terephthalate staple fibers and methods of combininglow-melting-point fibers for the purpose of increasing a heat bondingstrength. However, for the reasons explained above, the strength issignificantly low when the fiber diameter is 4.5 μm or smaller and,therefore, it has not been possible to sufficiently achieve a thinnersize while preventing strike-through.

US2005-6301 describes a method of mixing staple fibers with differentfiber lengths, but it is not possible to obtain a thin support substratehaving sufficiently high strength while preventing strike-through.

Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication SHO No. 60-238103 proposes usinga nonwoven fabric with a loose-dense bilayer structure prepared by a wetlaid method, in order to better prevent strike-through of the coatingresin. The loose-dense bilayer structure comprises a loose layer with afiber diameter of 17-54 μm and a fiber length of 3-50 mm on the resincoating side and a dense layer with a fiber diameter of 2.7-17 μm and afiber length of 3-50 mm on the back side.

However, a dense layer composed of thin fibers has a high L/D ratio andtherefore the fibers tend to tangle together during wet laid, and theobtained nonwoven fabric is susceptible to defects such as projections.When the fiber lengths are shortened to reduce tangling between thefibers, the strength tends to be reduced.

The aforementioned Japanese Unexamined Patent Application No. 60-238103therefore proposes a loose-dense-loose trilayer structure wherein athick fiber layer is further situated on the back of the dense layer inorder to guarantee strength. However, the obtained support substratecannot be satisfactory because of increased thickness.

Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication SHO No. 61-222506 describeslamination of a nonwoven fabric formed by a staple fiber dry method anda melt blown nonwoven fabric, followed by heat bonding to form aloose-dense structure. Even by this method, however, the problem ofunevenness is not eliminated in the staple fiber dry method. Inaddition, as a melt blown nonwoven fabric or ultrafine fiber wet laidnonwoven fabric has very low tensile strength and surface abrasivestrength, for example, a fiber volume of 70 g/m² or greater must be usedin the case of ultrafine fibers, while a fiber volume of 100 g/m² isnecessary with a dry method nonwoven fabric. Consequently, the thicknessof the support substrate is increased and a thin support substratecannot be satisfactorily achieved.

Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2003-245530 proposes aseparation membrane with improved strike-through prevention by providinggaps as the loose structure in the non-coating side, and using a thinnonwoven fabric with a thickness of no greater than 80 μm as the supportsubstrate. The support substrate requires a large amount of resin forfilling of the gaps in the loose layer when the coating resin penetratesfrom the dense layer to the loose layer, and the consequent effect ofreduced penetration rate in the direction of thickness is utilized.

The aforementioned Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No.2003-245530 mentions staple fiber wet laid nonwoven fabrics with twodifferent structures as examples of loose-dense structures. One of theseis a nonwoven fabric having a structure produced using a calender with atemperature differential, for formation of a highly dense coating sidewith high adhesive strength by high-temperature bonding, and alow-density non-coating side having a uniform structure in the planedirection by low-temperature bonding, while the other is a nonwovenfabric having a structure which is irregular in the plane direction orperiodically irregular, by forming hills and valleys on the non-coatingside by emboss bonding.

However, problems with nonwoven fabrics having the former structureinclude weak bonding conditions in 50 wt % or more of the fibers, andwrinkles during the separation membrane production process due to a lackof strength or low rigidity. Because of weak bonding on the coatingside, fluffing tends to occur upon contact with the guide roll in theresin coating step, leading to poor stability during resin coating.

A problem with nonwoven fabrics having the latter structure is that thevalleys having high fiber density are resistant to penetration and thecoating resin preferentially penetrates into the hills, such that thecoating resin reaches the tops of the hills before penetrating to thevalleys, therefore resulting in a non-uniform coating.

In order to avoid these problems, some supports are produced bylamination with perforated nonwoven fabrics or nonwoven fabrics withhill-valley forms produced by a separate step such as corrugation, butin such cases the hills and valleys cause thickness spots in the resincoating layer, resulting in reduced stability of the membraneperformance. The thickness spots in the resin coating layer are alsoproduced by emboss bonding, and are more notably produced with thinnernonwoven fabrics.

WO2004-94316 filed by the present inventors describes a supportsubstrate composed of three layers: a thermoplastic filament nonwovenfabric, a melt blown nonwoven fabric and a thermoplastic filamentnonwoven fabric, but the method of using the support substrate is notdescribed in detail.

DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION Problems to be Solved by the Invention

It is an object of the invention to solve the aforementioned problems ofthe prior art by providing a separation membrane support substratecomposed of a laminated nonwoven fabric with practical strength, whichis thin and exhibits excellent strike-through prevention and integrationwith coating resins.

Means for Solving the Problems

As a result of much diligent research on the aforementioned problems,the present inventors have achieved the present invention afterdiscovering that it is possible to obtain a laminated nonwoven fabricwith high strength and excellent strike-through prevention which issuitable for resin coating, by using thermoplastic resin filamentnonwoven fabrics, which were considered difficult to use in the priorart because of poor uniformity, as the top and bottom layers, situatingbetween them a small amount of melt blown fibers having a fiber diameterof no greater than 5 μm, and performing lamination, to a specifiedapparent density to form a composite, by heat bonding.

The present invention is as follows.

1. A separation membrane support substrate characterized by beingcomposed of a laminated nonwoven fabric comprising a front layer as theresin coating layer, a middle layer and a back layer which areintegrally formed by heat bonding, and by satisfying the followingconditions (1) to (5).

(1) The front layer has at least one layer comprising thermoplasticresin filaments with a single filament diameter of 7-30 μm.

(2) The middle layer has at least one layer comprising melt blown fiberswith a single fiber diameter of no greater than 5 μm, and a fiber basisweight of at least 1 g/m² and comprising no more than 30 wt % of thetotal fiber basis weight.

(3) The back layer has at least one layer comprising thermoplastic resinfilaments with a single filament diameter of 7-20 μm, and has a fiberbasis weight of 3-40 g/m².

(4) The laminated nonwoven fabric has an apparent density of 0.67-0.91g/cm³.

(5) The laminated nonwoven fabric has a thickness of 45-110 μm.

2. A separation membrane support substrate, according to 1. above,characterized in that the smoothness of the coating layer surface is0.2-2 μm in terms of the KES surface roughness SMD.

3. A separation membrane support substrate according to 1. or 2. above,characterized in that the filament diameter of the thermoplastic resinfilaments used in the front layer is 7-20 μm.

4. A separation membrane support substrate according to any one of 1. to3. above, characterized in that the fiber diameter of the melt blownfibers is 1-3 μm.

5. A separation membrane support substrate according to any one of 1. to4. above, characterized in that the melting point of the thermoplasticresin filaments and the melt blown fibers is 180° C. or higher.

6. A separation membrane support substrate according to any one of 1. to5. above, characterized in that the main component of the thermoplasticresin filaments and/or melt blown fibers is a polyester fiber orpolyester copolymer fiber, or a polyester and polyester copolymer blendfiber.

7. A separation membrane support substrate according to 6. above,characterized in that the melt blown fibers comprise polyethyleneterephthalate (hereinafter abbreviated as PET) with a solution viscosity(ηsp/c) of 0.2-0.8.

8. A separation membrane support substrate according to any one of 1. to7. above, characterized in that the laminated nonwoven fabric issubjected to calender treatment after integral formation by heatbonding.

9. A process for production of a separation membrane support substrate,characterized by satisfying the following conditions (a) to (d).

(a) a thermoplastic resin filament is spun on a conveyor using athermoplastic resin with a melting point of 180° C. or higher to form atleast one nonwoven fabric layer,

(b) at least one layer of fibers with a crystallinity of 15-40% and afiber diameter of no greater than 5 μm, composed of a thermoplasticresin with a melting point of 180° C. or higher, is laminated thereoverby a melt blow method,

(c) at least one layer of a nonwoven fabric of thermoplastic resinfilaments composed of a thermoplastic resin with a melting point of 180°C. or higher is further laminated, and

(d) a flat roll is used for heat bonding at a temperature of 50-120° C.below the melting point of the thermoplastic resin filaments, at a linepressure of 100-1000 N/cm, after which calender treatment is carried outat a temperature of at least 10° C. higher than the aforementioned heatbonding temperature and 10-100° C. lower than the melting point of thethermoplastic resin filaments, at a line pressure of 100-1000 N/cm.

10. A process for production of a separation membrane support substrateaccording to 9. above, characterized in that the thermoplastic resin isa polyester-based resin.

The present invention will now be explained in greater detail.

The separation membrane support substrate of the invention is composedof a laminated nonwoven fabric wherein a small amount of melt blownfibers (middle layer) are laminated and heat bonded betweenthermoplastic resin filament nonwoven fabrics as the front layer andback layer. In a laminated nonwoven fabric having this structure, theapparent density is set within a specific range in order to achieve theopposing properties of adhesion with coating resins and strike-throughprevention, thereby allowing high strength to be achieved, even withthin nonwoven fabrics with low amounts of fibers.

That is, the first feature of the present invention is that the supportsubstrate is made of a nonwoven fabric composed mainly of thermoplasticresin filaments.

It is necessary to shorten the fiber lengths in order to obtain a thinstaple fiber wet laid nonwoven fabric using thin fibers and, as fewerbonding points result per single filament, the strength of the nonwovenfabric is reduced. Consequently, in order to obtain sufficient strengthto withstand the resin coating step it has been necessary for the fiberdiameter to be 16 μm or greater.

On the other hand, as a thermoplastic resin filament nonwoven fabric hasvirtually no strength reduction due to thinned fibers, it has beenpossible to obtain sufficiently high strength even with a filamentdiameter of 7-20 μm. Furthermore, whereas the strength is drasticallyreduced when using a small amount of fibers in a staple-fiber nonwovenfabric, in a thermoplastic resin filament nonwoven fabric the strengthis only reduced by the degree of reduction in fiber amount, andtherefore high strength can be realized even with a low fiber amount.

As filaments are used for the coating layer according to the invention,there are fewer fiber ends and the generation of fluff is notablyreduced, thereby allowing a smooth coating surface to be obtained.

The second feature of the invention is that a melt blown fiber nonwovenfabric is situated in the middle layer and heat bonding is performed bya method such as heat pressing. For this construction, low-crystallinitymelt blown fibers also function as the binder for the thermoplasticresin filament layer, thereby yielding a nonwoven fabric with an evenhigher strength. Specifically, it is possible to achieve remarkably highstrength by a production method in which the spun melt blown fibers arecollected so as to fall directly onto the thermoplastic resin filamentlayer.

The third feature of the invention is that the laminated nonwoven fabrichas an apparent density of 0.67-0.91 g/cm³. By specifying this range forthe apparent density, the gaps between fibers in the melt blown fiberlayer are sufficiently small and, as the thermoplastic resin filamentsof the front layer and back layer situated above and below are firmlyanchored, it is difficult for the fine fibers of the middle layer toshift position, thus effectively preventing strike-through of thecoating resin.

In the support substrate of the invention, the coating resin is retainedand hardens in the melt blown fiber layer serving as the middle layer,forming an anchor-like structure (hereinafter referred to as “anchoringeffect”), and therefore the interface between the fibers and resin isresistant to detachment and high adhesion can be achieved. In this typeof structure, the cleavage strength of the anchor section, i.e. the linksection connecting the resin infiltrating into the melt blown fiberlayer with the coating resin on the surface, is added as an increment tothe interfacial detachment strength, and therefore the resultingdetachment strength is very high.

Since the apparent density of the laminated nonwoven fabric is 0.67-0.91g/cm³ according to the invention, a sufficient amount of resin is ableto enter the melt blown fiber layer and the gaps in the coating surface,thereby allowing high detachment strength to be achieved. It is alsopossible to simultaneously obtain the opposing properties ofstrike-through prevention and adhesion.

In a laminated nonwoven fabric forming a support substrate of theinvention, heat bonding with a hot roll or the like is preferably usedto obtain the specified apparent density.

For heat bonding with a hot roll or the like, the upper layer and lowerlayer of the support substrate are placed in direct contact with theheating source, and hence film-like liquid impermeable sections tend topartially form due to deformation or fusion caused by softening. Suchliquid impermeable sections cannot easily exhibit the anchoring effectby the coating resin, and thus tend to impair the resin adhesiveproperties and result in detachment or tearing of the separationmembrane under pressure fluctuation or backwashing.

In a support substrate of the invention, however, a melt blown fiberlayer with satisfactory heat bonding properties is present in the middlelayer and, therefore, integral lamination by heat bonding with thethermoplastic resin filament layers above and below can be easilyaccomplished even under low temperature heat treatment conditions, toobtain a laminated nonwoven fabric with minimal film formation of thefibers of the upper and lower layers.

The construction of a separation membrane support substrate of theinvention will now be explained.

FIG. 1 is a schematic drawing showing an example of a cross-section of aseparation membrane support substrate according to the invention. InFIG. 1, 1 is the front layer, 2 is the middle layer and 3 is the backlayer.

When used as a reverse osmosis membrane or the like it may be subjectedto heat treatment of 180° C. and higher, and it must be heat resistant.According to the invention, therefore, the melting point of thethermoplastic resin filaments and melt blown fibers is preferably 180°C. or higher.

According to the invention, the front layer is a filament nonwovenfabric having a thermoplastic resin filament layer as at least onelayer, obtained by a spun bond method.

As thermoplastic resin filaments to be used in the front layer there arepreferred polyester-based filaments such as highly heat-resistant PET,polybutylene terephthalate and polytrimethylene terephthalate,polyamide-based filaments such as nylon-6, nylon-66, nylon-610 andnylon-612, or copolymer or blend filaments which are composed mainly ofthese resins. Among these, polyester-based filaments are preferredbecause of their high strength and dimensional stability. They may alsobe modified by addition of small amounts of low-melting-point componentssuch as polyolefins, in a range which does not affect the practicalstrength.

The thermoplastic resin filaments used in the front layer have afilament diameter of no greater than 30 μm. The filament diameterpreferably does not exceed 30 μm because the surface smoothness isreduced and the resin coating becomes unstable. Increasing the surfacesmoothness by heat pressing produces a surface structure with morefilm-like sections as a result of crushing of the thick filaments,thereby inhibiting penetration of the coating resin. The filamentdiameter is preferably 7-30 μm and more preferably 7-20 μm.

The middle layer is at least one layer composed of melt blown fibers.

Because heat treatment may be necessary in the separation membraneproduction process, the melt blown fibers used are preferablypolyester-based fibers such as highly heat-resistant PET, polybutyleneterephthalate and polytrimethylene terephthalate, polyamide-based fiberssuch as nylon-6, nylon-66, nylon-610 and nylon-612, or copolymer orblend fibers which are composed mainly of these resins. Among these,polyester-based fibers are preferred for use because of their highstrength and dimensional stability. They may also be modified byaddition of small amounts of low-melting-point components such aspolyolefins, in a range which does not affect the practical strength.

The melt blown fibers in the middle layer must have a fiber diameter ofno greater than 5 μm and a fiber weight of 1 g/m² or greater, in aproportion of no greater than 30 wt % of the total fibers in the entiresupport substrate. If the fiber diameter exceeds 5 μm, the gaps betweenfibers will be too large and strike-through prevention of the coatingresin will be inadequate. The preferred fiber diameter range is 1-3 μm.

If the fiber weight is less than 1 g/m², adequate strike-throughprevention cannot be obtained. Also, if the melt blown fibers exceed 30wt % of the total fibers in the entire support substrate, the amount ofthermoplastic resin filaments in the support substrate will be too low.As the thermoplastic resin filaments perform the primary strengthmaintenance function for the support substrate, this will result inreduced strength of the support substrate despite the binder function ofthe melt blown fibers in the middle layer. The fiber basis weight in themiddle layer is preferably 3-25 g/m², while it is preferably at least1.5 wt % and more preferably 3-25 wt % of the total fibers in the entiresupport substrate.

According to the invention, the back layer is a filament nonwoven fabriccomprising at least one thermoplastic resin filament layer, obtained bya spun bond method.

The thermoplastic resin filaments used for the back layer may becomposed of the same resin as for the thermoplastic resin filaments ofthe front layer, and preferably there are used polyester-based filamentssuch as highly heat-resistant PET, polybutylene terephthalate andpolytrimethylene terephthalate, polyamide-based filaments such asnylon-6, nylon-66, nylon-610 and nylon-612, or copolymer or blendfilaments which are composed mainly of these resins. Among these,polyester-based filaments are especially preferred for use because oftheir high strength and dimensional stability in humid conditions. Theymay also be modified by addition of small amounts of low-melting-pointcomponents such as polyolefins, in a range which does not affect thepractical strength.

The thermoplastic resin filaments in the back layer have a filamentdiameter of 7-20 μm. If the filament diameter is less than 7 μm, thegaps between filaments will approach the melt blown fiber layer (middlelayer) and increase the force of capillary action attracting the coatingresin retained in the melt blown layer, thus making it impossible toachieve an adequate strike-through preventing function.

If the filament diameter exceeds 20 μm, the gaps between filaments willbecome too wide making it impossible to achieve adequate anchoring ofthe melt blown fibers and permitting shifting of the melt blown fibersunder the pressure applied during coating, thereby widening the gapsbetween fibers of the middle layer and reducing the strike-throughpreventing function. The preferred filament diameter range is 10-15 μm.

The basis weight of the thermoplastic resin filaments used in the backlayer is 3 g/m² or greater. As the thermoplastic resin filaments in theback layer perform the role of anchoring the melt blown fibers in themiddle layer, a thermoplastic resin filament basis weight of less than 3g/m² will result in insufficient anchoring of the melt blown fibers,tending to allow shifting of the melt blown fibers and reducing thestrike-through preventing function. The preferred range for the filamentbasis weight is 3-40 g/m².

Using the same type of thermoplastic resin for the front layer, middlelayer and back layer is preferred for increased adhesion of the entirelaminated nonwoven fabric, and especially the use of the samepolyester-based resin is preferred in order to achieve satisfactorydimensional stability and high strength.

The support substrate of the invention comprises a thermoplastic resinfilament web (S₁) for the front layer, a melt blown fiber web (M) forthe middle layer and a thermoplastic resin filament web (S₂) for theback layer, laminated in a S₁/M/S₂ structure. The front layer, middlelayer and back layer may each be composed of one or more layers, forexample, with a structure containing two middle layers such asS₁/M/M′/S₂. Alternatively, the structure may have two each of the frontlayer, middle layer and back layer, such as S₁/S′₁/M/M′/S₂/S′₂.

The support substrate of the invention is composed of a laminatednonwoven fabric with an apparent density of 0.67-0.91 g/cm³. If theapparent density is less than 0.67 g/cm³, the gaps between the meltblown fibers will be widened and adhesion with the thermoplastic resinfilaments will be weakened, thereby leading to inferior strike-throughprevention. If the apparent density is greater than 0.91 g/cm³, thedensity will be too high and fewer gaps will be present to allowpenetration of the coating resin, such that integration between theresin and support substrate will be inadequate. The apparent density ismore preferably 0.69-0.83 g/cm³.

When heat bonding is carried out adequately to the interior of thelaminated nonwoven fabric in an attempt to obtain a laminated nonwovenfabric with high apparent density, it may be necessary to carry out theheat bonding at high temperature and/or high pressure. However, whenheat bonding is carried out at high temperature and/or high pressure,the surface fibers may undergo deformation or film formation, and whenheat bonding is carried out at low temperature and high pressure, thelow degree of adhesion between fibers may result in generation of fluff.

However, as the present invention employs melt blown fibers in themiddle layer which have low crystal orientation and begin to adhere at atemperature above the glass transition temperature, it is possible torealize adequate heat bonding more readily to the interior at a lowertemperature than in the prior art, without resulting in deformation ofthe surface fibers or film formation or generation of fluff.

According to the invention, the thickness of the entire laminatednonwoven fabric must be 45-110 μm. If the thickness is less than 45 μm,strike-through prevention for the resin will be insufficient even with ahigh apparent density, while if it is greater than 110 μm, the supportsubstrate will be too thick and the object of the invention (reducedthickness) will not be achieved. The thickness is preferably in therange of 60-100 μm.

The support substrate of the invention is integrally laminated by heatbonding. Specifically, as self-adhesion of the thermoplastic resin isthe only bonding force, no impurities are eluted out of the supportsubstrate and therefore impurities do not contaminate solutions purifiedby separation with the separation membrane.

The support substrate of the invention preferably has a smoothness of0.2-2 μm, in terms of KES surface roughness SMD, on the surface of thecoating side. A surface smoothness in this range will reduce pinholes inthe coating resin.

The support substrate of the invention also preferably has a formationindex of no greater than 120. The formation index is an indicator ofuniformity, and if it is no greater than 120, local strike-through ofthe coating resin will be reduced.

According to the invention, the resin used for coating is notparticularly restricted so long as it exhibits performance as aseparation membrane. As examples there may be mentioned polysulfone,polyethersulfone, polyphenylenesulfone, polyphenylenesulfide sulfone,polyacrylonitrile, polyvinylidene chloride, cellulose acetate,polyurethane, polyolefins and the like.

A preferred production process for a support substrate according to theinvention will now be explained.

The laminated nonwoven fabric forming the support substrate of theinvention is obtained by a production process satisfying the followingconditions (a) to (d).

(a) a thermoplastic resin filament is spun on a conveyor using athermoplastic resin with a melting point of 180° C. or higher to form atleast one nonwoven fabric layer,

(b) at least one layer of fibers with a crystallinity of 15-40% and afiber diameter of no greater than 5 μm, composed of a thermoplasticresin with a melting point of 180° C. or higher, is laminated thereoverby a melt blow method,

(c) at least one layer of a nonwoven fabric of thermoplastic resinfilaments composed of a thermoplastic resin with a melting point of 180°C. or higher is further laminated, and

(d) a flat roll is used for heat bonding at a temperature of 50-120° C.below the melting point of the thermoplastic resin filaments, at a linepressure of 100-1000 N/cm, after which calender treatment is carried outat a temperature of at least 10° C. higher than the aforementioned heatbonding temperature and 10-100° C. lower than the melting point of thethermoplastic resin filaments, at a line pressure of 100-1000 N/cm.

The spinning method for the thermoplastic resin filaments is preferablya known spun bond method.

The main feature of the production process of the invention is that thefine fiber layer is blown directly onto the thermoplastic resin filamentweb by a melt blow method, so that the melt blown fibers are allowed topenetrate into the thermoplastic resin filament web. As mentioned above,penetration of the melt blown fibers into the thermoplastic resinfilament web results in firm anchoring of each layer, so that not onlyis the strength of the laminated nonwoven fabric improved but the finefibers in the middle layer are resistant to shifting by external forces,thereby providing excellent strike-through prevention.

The method used to control the degree of penetration is preferably onein which the relative distance between the melt blow spinning nozzle andthe thermoplastic resin filament web surface on the conveyor is set toabout 12 cm, and the aspiration force for attraction from the back sideof the conveyor is adjusted.

Moreover, although the reason is not fully understood, it wassurprisingly found that using a resin with a relatively high meltingpoint as the thermoplastic resin for the melt blown fibers betterfacilitates penetration of the melt blown fibers. Thus, it is preferredto use a resin with a high melting point of 180° C. or above, such asPET or polyamide, as the thermoplastic resin. Also, a crystallinity of15-40% for the melt blown fibers is preferred for more satisfactoryadhesion and penetration.

In the case of PET, using a resin with a solution viscosity (ηsp/c) ofpreferably 0.2-0.8 and more preferably 0.2-0.6 will allow adjustment ofthe crystallinity of the melt blown fibers in a range of 15-40% underordinary melt blow spinning conditions.

In the case of a polyamide, using a resin with a relative viscosity(ηrel) of preferably 1.8-2.7 and more preferably 1.8-2.2 will allowadjustment of the crystallinity of the melt blown fibers in a range of15-40% under ordinary melt blow spinning conditions.

As high dimensional stability under humid conditions is preferred forthe support substrate of the invention, it is preferred to use apolyester resin. Specifically, the resin forming the melt blown fibersis preferably PET With a solution viscosity (ηsp/c) of 0.2-0.8, and morepreferably the crystallinity of the melt blown fibers is 15-40%.

The manner of penetration of the melt blown fibers is, specifically, notpenetration of single fibers in the form of whiskers or tangles into thethermoplastic resin filament layer, but rather sections with multiplefibers penetrating in a group are formed, such that the penetrated layerhas an embedded or entangled arrangement with a portion of the filamentsenclosed. Moreover, the structure of a portion of the penetrated meltblown fibers adhering to the thermoplastic resin filaments is in a formpresent across the whole area as a mixed layer of the melt blown fibersand the thermoplastic resin filaments.

A heat bonding step may be carried out for bonding using a flat roll ata temperature of 50-120° C. below the melting point of the thermoplasticresin filaments and a line pressure of 100-1000 N/cm, followed bycalender treatment at a temperature of at least 10° C. higher than theaforementioned heat bonding temperature and 10-100° C. lower than themelting point of the thermoplastic resin filaments, at a line pressureof 100-1000 N/cm, to obtain sufficient strength and an apparent densityin the range of the invention.

If the temperature for calender treatment is lower than the meltingpoint of the thermoplastic resin filaments and the difference is lessthan 10° C. the apparent density will be too high, and if it is lowerthan the melting point of the thermoplastic resin filaments and thedifference is greater than 100° C., the strength will be insufficientand fluff will tend to be generated on the surface, resulting in coatinglayer defects.

If the line pressure for the heat bonding step and calender treatment isless than 100 N/cm the adhesion will be inadequate and sufficientstrength will not be exhibited. If it exceeds 1000 N/cm, the fibers willundergo excessive deformation and the apparent density will be higherthan the range of the invention.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a schematic drawing showing an example of a cross-section of aseparation membrane support substrate according to the invention.

BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION

The present invention will now be explained in greater detail, byexamples, with the understanding that the invention is in no wayrestricted by the examples.

The measuring methods and evaluation methods were as follows.

(1) Fiber Basis Weight (g/m²)

This was measured according to JIS-L-1906. Three 20-cm length×25-cmwidth test pieces were taken for every 1 m width of material, the weightwas measured, and the average value was calculated to determine theweight per unit area.

(2) Thickness (μm)

This was measured according to JIS-L-1906. The thickness was measured at10 locations along the width at a contact pressure load of 100 g/cm²,and the average value was calculated. The thickness gauge used was aPeacock No. 207. Because the minimum scale mark was 0.01, it was read tothree decimal places and averaged, and then rounded to two significantdigits and recorded as μm.

(3) Apparent Density (g/cm³)

The fiber basis weight (g/m²) measured in (1) and the thickness (μm)measured in (2) were used for calculation by the following formula.

Apparent density=(fiber basis weight)/(thickness)

(4) Fiber Diameter (μm)

After removing 10 cm from the edges of the sample (nonwoven fabric), a1-cm square test piece was cut out from regions every 20 cm along thewidth of the sample. Each test piece was measured for fiber diameter at30 points using a microscope, and the average of the measured values(rounded off to two decimal places) was calculated and recorded as thediameter of the fibers composing the sample.

(5) Tensile Strength (kg/5 cm)

After removing 10 cm from the edges of the sample (nonwoven fabric), a3-cm width×20-cm length test piece was cut out. A load was applied untilthe test piece broke, and the average value for the strength of the testpiece at the time of maximum load was determined in the MD (machinedirection).

(6) Crystallinity (%)

Approximately 8 mg of a sample (fibers) was weighed out and placed in asample pan, and a sample was prepared using a sample sealer.

A DSC210 by SII Nanotechnology Co., Ltd. was used for measurement underthe following conditions.

Measuring atmosphere: 50 ml/min nitrogen gas

Temperature elevating rate: 10° C./min

Measuring temperature range: 25-300° C.

Polyester fibers have a cold crystallizing portion, and therefore thecrystallinity was determined by the following formula (rounded off totwo decimal places).

Crystallinity(%)=[(heat quantity of melted portion)−(heat quantity ofcold crystal portion)]/(heat quantity of total crystal)

The heat quantity values used were those listed in the followingliterature.

Heat quantity of PET total crystal: 126.4 J/g (“Macromol. Physics”Academic Press, New York & London Vol. 1, P 389 (1973))

Heat quantity of PP total crystal: 165 J/g (J. Chem. Phys. Ref. Data,10(4) 1981 1051)

Heat quantity of nylon-66 total crystal: 190.8 J/g (J. Polymer Scial., 12697(196.3))

(7) Melting Point (° C.)

Measurement was carried out in the same manner as (6) above, and themelting point was defined as the temperature where the asymptote for theinflection point at the introduction of the melting peak crossed withthe baseline in the temperature region higher than Tg.

(8) Solution Viscosity (ηsp/c)

A 0.025 g portion of a sample was dissolved in 25 ml oforthochlorophenol (OCP). The solution was heated to 90° C. (or to 120°C. if necessary for dissolution). Measurement was conducted in aviscosity tube at a measuring temperature of 35° C., and the calculationwas performed using the following formula. The arithmetic average ofthree measured points of the sample was taken and the value was roundedoff to three decimal places.

ηsp/c=[(t−t0)/t0]/c

In this formula, t is the solution passage time (sec), t0 is the solventpassage time (sec) and c is the amount of solute (g) per 1000 ml.

(9) Relative Viscosity (ηrel)

A 0.025 g portion of sample was dissolved in 25 ml of 98% sulfuric acid.Measurement was conducted in a viscosity tube at a measuring temperatureof 25° C., and calculation was performed by the following formula. Thearithmetic average of three measured points of the sample was taken andthe value was rounded off to two decimal places.

ηrel=t/t0

In the formula, t is the solution passage time (sec) and t0 is thesolvent passage time (sec).

(10) Strike-Through Prevention

As a coating resin stock solution there was used a solution ofpolysulfone in dimethylformamide (DMF) (20 wt % concentration). Thestock solution was coated onto a support substrate fixed on a stainlesssteel sheet by 200 μm-thick and, after two seconds, was dipped inpurified water at 20° C., allowed to coagulate, rinsed and dewatered,and then dried with a hot air drier at 80° C. to obtain a separationmembrane.

The evaluation was conducted based on the following scale.

Good: No resin found adhering to stainless steel sheet.

Poor: Resin adhered to stainless steel sheet.

(11) Adhesion (Peel Strength: N/1.5 cm)

The separation membrane obtained in (10) above was used as a sample formeasurement of the peel strength of the coating resin film. A tensiletester was used to measure the stress required for peeling between thesupport substrate and coating resin film at a speed of 200 mm/min, witha width of 1.5 cm. The measurement was conducted at 3 points, and theaverage was recorded as an index of the adhesion (rounded off to twodecimal places).

(12) Surface Roughness SMD (μm)

The surface smoothness of the coating side of the support substrate wasmeasured using a KES FB-4 by Katotech Co., Ltd. The surface roughnessSMD was measured in the MD direction under standard conditions (fabrictension: 400 gf/20 cm, initial load: 10 gf) at 3 points, and the averagewas recorded. A smaller value indicates a more excellent surfacesmoothness.

(13) Formation Index

An FMT-MIII formation tester (U.S. Pat. No. 1,821,351, Nomura Shoji Co.,Ltd.) was used for measurement in the CD direction at 4 points permeter, to determine the formation index. A smaller value indicatesformation uniformity and lack of spots.

Examples 1-14, 18, Comparative Examples 2, 4-6, 8-12

As the back layer, ordinary PET was used for extrusion toward a filamentgroup-shifting collecting net, and spinning was carried out by a spunbond method at a spinning temperature of 300° C., at a spinning speed of3500 m/min, after which the filaments were sufficiently opened by coronacharging to about 3 μC/g, to prepare a thermoplastic resin filament webon the collecting net. The filament diameter was adjusted by changingthe discharge volume.

Next, for the middle layer, PET (solution viscosity: ηsp/c=0.50) wasused for spinning by a melt blow method under conditions with a spinningtemperature of 300° C. and heated air at 1000 Nm³/hr/m, and blowing ontothe thermoplastic resin filament web. Here, the distance from the meltblow nozzle to the thermoplastic resin filament web was 100 mm, thesuction force on the collecting surface directly under the melt blownozzle was 0.2 kPa, and the air speed was 7 m/sec. The fiber diameterand crystallinity were adjusted by changing the discharge volume.

Thermoplastic resin filaments were laminated with prescribed filamentdiameters and filament basis weights directly onto each obtainedlaminated web as a front layer, by the same method as for the firstthermoplastic resin filament web, to obtain laminated webs each havingthe structure of front layer: thermoplastic resin filaments (S₁)/middlelayer: melt blown fibers (M)/back layer: thermoplastic resin filaments(S₂). Each obtained laminated web was subjected to heat bonding with aflat roll under the conditions shown in Table 2, and then a calenderroll was used under the conditions also shown in Table 2 for adjustmentof the thickness and apparent density to the respective apparentdensities as shown in Table 2, to obtain laminated nonwoven fabrics.

The supports made of the obtained laminated nonwoven fabrics and theirevaluation results are shown in Tables 1 and 2.

The Comparative Examples 2 and 9 which had thick filament diameters forthe surface and back layers, Comparative Example 8 which had thinfilaments for the back layer and Comparative Example 10 which had a lowfilament basis weight for the back layer, all exhibited inferiorstrike-through prevention.

The cause of strike-through in Comparative Example 2 was attributed tonotable sparse sections in the coating surface, due to the largefilament diameter of the front layer. The strike-through prevention wasalso poor in Comparative Example 4 which had a large fiber diameter forthe melt blown layer and Comparative Example 5 which had a small fiberdiameter.

Comparative Example 6 which had an excessively high proportion for themelt blown fiber layer exhibited insufficient tensile strength.

Comparative Example 11 which had an excessively low apparent densityexhibited poor strike-through prevention. This was attributed toinadequate anchoring by the melt blown fibers. Also, Comparative Example12 which had an excessively high apparent density exhibitedunsatisfactory adhesion due to poor permeability of the coating resin.

Example 15

A laminated nonwoven fabric having a thermoplastic resin filament/meltblown fiber/thermoplastic resin filament structure was obtained in thesame manner as Example 1. However, the heat bonding conditions with theflat roll were a line pressure of 367 N/cm and a roll temperature of225° C. on the surface side (coating side) and 215° C. on the back side.

The support made of the obtained laminated nonwoven fabric and itsevaluation results are shown in Tables 1 and 2.

Example 16

A laminated nonwoven fabric was obtained in the same manner as Example1, except that the calender roll temperature was 231° C. for both thesurface, and back sides, and the line pressure was 570 N/cm. The surfacesmoothness of the support substrate composed of the obtained laminatednonwoven fabric is shown in Table 3 together with the surface smoothnessof the support substrate obtained in Example 1.

The surface of Example 1 had excellent smoothness. For Example 16, somestreaks were apparent due to fine irregularities in the coating surface,but the surface smoothness was satisfactory and no significant problemswere encountered in coating.

Example 17

A laminated nonwoven fabric was obtained in the same manner as Example1, except that the corona charge was 1.7 μC/g. The formation index ofthe support substrate composed of the obtained laminated nonwoven fabricis shown in Table 4, together with the formation index of the supportsubstrate obtained in Example 1. The formation indexes of both Example 1and Example 17 were below 120, the formation was uniform and thestrike-through prevention was satisfactory.

Comparative Example 1

For the front layer, PET staple fibers with a fiber diameter of 16 μmand a fiber length of 5 mm were collected on a net by a wet laid methodto a basis weight of 16 g/m², dewatered and dried, and then contactbonded with a flat roll to an extent without dissipation of the fibers,to obtain a staple fiber web.

Next, as the middle layer, melt blown fibers were blown onto the web inthe same manner as Example 1 and a thermoplastic resin filament web waslaminated thereover as a back layer. The obtained laminated web was heatbonded with a flat roll and calender roll to obtain a laminated nonwovenfabric.

The support made of the obtained laminated nonwoven fabric and itsevaluation results are shown in Tables 1 and 2. The support substratecomposed of the laminated nonwoven fabric exhibited strike-through ofthe coating resin and low tensile strength. It is believed thatstrike-through occurred because the melt blown fiber layer could notwithstand the coating pressure, as the PET staple fiber layer was unableto firmly anchor the melt blown fibers of the middle layer.

Comparative Example 3

As the back layer, ordinary PET was used for extrusion toward a filamentgroup-shifting collecting net, and spinning was carried out by a spunbond method at a spinning temperature of 300° C., at a spinning speed of3500 m/min, after which the filaments were sufficiently opened by coronacharging to about 3 μC/g, to prepare a thermoplastic resin filament webon the collecting net. The filament diameter was adjusted by changingthe discharge volume.

As the middle layer, PET staple fibers with a fiber diameter of 5 μm anda fiber length of 3 mm were collected on a net to 12 g/m² by a wet laidmethod, dewatered and dried, and then contact bonded with a flat roll toan extent without dissipation of the fibers, to obtain a staple fiberweb.

The staple fiber web was laminated onto the previously preparedthermoplastic resin filament web, and then a thermoplastic resinfilament web was spun to a prescribed filament diameter and filamentbasis weight and laminated onto the laminate as a front layer in thesame manner as the previous thermoplastic resin filament web, to obtaina laminated web having a thermoplastic resin filament/melt blownfiber/thermoplastic resin filament structure. The obtained laminated webwas heat bonded with a flat roll and calender roll to obtain a laminatednonwoven fabric.

The support made of the obtained laminated nonwoven fabric and itsevaluation results are shown in Tables 1 and 2. The support substratecomposed of the laminated nonwoven fabric had low tensile strength andexhibited strike-through of the coating resin. It is believed thatstrike-through occurred because the staple fibers of the middle layerbeing ultrafine and having low adhesion were unable to withstand thepressure during coating.

Comparative Example 7

As the front layer, ordinary PET was used for extrusion toward afilament group-shifting collecting net, and spinning was carried out bya spun bond method at a spinning temperature of 300° C., at a spinningspeed of 3500 m/min, after which the filaments were sufficiently openedby corona charging to about 3 μC/g, to prepare a thermoplastic resinfilament web on the collecting net. The filament diameter was adjustedby changing the discharge volume.

Next, for the middle layer, PET (solution viscosity: ηsp/c=0.50) wasused for spinning by a melt blow method under conditions with a spinningtemperature of 300° C. and heated air at 1000 Nm³/hr/m, and the obtainedfibers were blown onto the thermoplastic resin filament web. Here, thedistance from the melt blow nozzle to the thermoplastic resin filamentweb was 100 mm, the suction force on the collecting surface directlyunder the melt blow nozzle was 0.2 kPa, and the air speed was 7 m/sec.The fiber diameter and crystallinity were adjusted by changing thedischarge volume.

For the back layer, PET staple fibers with a fiber diameter of 16 μm anda fiber length of 5 mm were collected on a net by a wet laid method to abasis weight of 16 g/m², dewatered and dried, and then contact bondedwith a flat roll and calender roll to an extent without dissipation ofthe fibers, to obtain a staple fiber web.

The staple fiber web was laminated onto the previously preparedthermoplastic resin filament web/melt blown fiber web and heat bondedwith a flat roll to obtain a laminated nonwoven fabric.

The support made of the obtained laminated nonwoven fabric and itsevaluation results are shown in Tables 1 and 2. The support substratecomposed of the laminated nonwoven fabric exhibited strike-through andhad low tensile strength. It is believed that strike-through occurredbecause the PET staple fiber layer could not adequately anchor the meltblown fibers of the middle layer, resulting in shifting of the meltblown fibers by the pressure during coating.

Comparative Example 13

PET staple fibers with a fiber diameter of 16 μm and a fiber length of 5mm were collected on a net by a wet laid method to 70 g/m², dewateredand dried, and then contact bonded with a calender roll to obtain anonwoven fabric.

The obtained nonwoven fabric and its evaluation results are shown inTables 1 and 2.

The support substrate composed of the nonwoven fabric had no smoothnessproblems, but the tensile strength was low and strike-through wasextensive.

Comparative Example 14

PET staple fibers with a fiber diameter of 10 μm and a fiber length of 5mm were collected on a net to 70 g/m² by a wet laid method, dewateredand dried, and then contact bonded with a calender roll to an extent ofnot dissipating the fibers, to obtain a nonwoven fabric. The obtainednonwoven fabric and its evaluation results are shown in Tables 1 and 2.

The support substrate composed of the nonwoven fabric had numerousprojections due to tangling of the fibers, and was thus unsuitable forresin coating.

The results are shown in Tables 1 to 4.

In Tables 1 to 4, PET stands for polyethylene terephthalate, NY fornylon, MB for melt blown web, SB for spun bond web and SL for spun laceweb.

TABLE 1 Front layer Middle layer Fiber Fiber Fiber Fiber basis MeltingFiber basis weight Fiber diameter weight point Fiber diameter weightratio type μm g/m² ° C. type μm g/m² wt % Example 1 PET SB 16 29 260 PETMB 1.6 12 17.1 Example 2 PET SB 16 29 260 PET MB 3 12 17.1 Example 3 PETSB 16 29 260 MB PET/NY 1.6 12 17.1 Example 4 PET SB 16 29 260 PET MB 1.612 17.1 Example 5 PET SB 30 29 260 PET MB 1.6 12 17.1 Example 6 PET SB16 29 260 PET MB 5 12 17.1 Example 7 PET SB 16 29 260 PET MB 1.6 1 1.7Example 8 PET SB 16 20 260 PET MB 1.6 17 29.8 Example 9 PET SB 16 29 260PET MB 1.6 12 17.1 Example 10 PET SB 16 29 260 PET MB 1.6 12 17.1Example 11 PET SB 16 29 260 PET MB 1.6 12 27.3 Example 12 PET SB 16 24260 PET MB 1.6 12 20.0 Example 13 PET SB 16 34 260 PET MB 1.6 14 17.1Example 14 PET SB 16 29 180 PET MB 1.6 12 17.1 Example 15 PET SB 16 29260 PET MB 1.6 12 17.1 Example 18 PET SB 12 28 260 PET MB 1.8 11 16.7Comp. Ex. 1 PET SL 16 29 260 PET MB 1.6 12 17.1 Comp. Ex. 2 PET SB 35 29260 PET MB 1.6 12 17.1 Comp. Ex. 3 PET SB 16 29 260 PET SL 5(3 mm) 1217.1 Comp. Ex. 4 PET SB 16 29 260 PET MB 7 12 17.1 Comp. Ex. 5 PET SB 1629 260 PET MB 1.6 0.8 1.4 Comp. Ex. 6 PET SB 16 15 260 PET MB 1.6 3050.0 Comp. Ex. 7 PET SB 16 29 260 PET MB 1.6 12 17.1 Comp. Ex. 8 PET SB16 29 260 PET MB 1.6 12 17.1 Comp. Ex. 9 PET SB 16 29 260 PET MB 1.6 1217.1 Comp. Ex. 10 PET SB 16 50 260 PET MB 1.6 12 18.8 Comp. Ex. 11 PETSB 16 20 260 PET MB 1.6 8 16.7 Comp. Ex. 12 PET SB 16 33 260 PET MB 1.618 21.4 Comp. Ex. 13 SL 16(5 mm) 70 260 Comp. Ex. 14 SL 10(5 mm) 70 260Back layer Middle layer Fiber Melting Fiber basis Melting Solution pointFiber diameter weight point Crystallinity % viscosity ° C. type μm g/m²° C. Example 1 30 0.5 260 PET SB 16 29 260 Example 2 30 0.5 260 PET SB16 29 260 Example 3 30 0.5 260 PET SB 16 29 260 Example 4 35 0.9 260 PETSB 16 29 260 Example 5 30 0.5 260 PET SB 16 29 260 Example 6 30 0.5 260PET SB 16 29 260 Example 7 30 0.5 260 PET SB 16 29 260 Example 8 30 0.5260 PET SB 16 20 260 Example 9 30 0.5 260 PET SB 7 29 260 Example 10 300.5 260 PET SB 20 29 260 Example 11 30 0.5 260 PET SB 16 3 260 Example12 30 0.5 260 PET SB 16 24 260 Example 13 30 0.5 260 PET SB 16 34 260Example 14 30 0.5 180 PET SB 16 29 180 Example 15 30 0.5 260 PET SB 1629 260 Example 18 30 0.5 260 PET SB 12 28 260 Comp. Ex. 1 30 0.5 260 PETSB 16 29 260 Comp. Ex. 2 30 0.5 260 PET S8 16 29 260 Comp. Ex. 3 50 0.5260 PET S8 16 29 260 Comp. Ex. 4 30 0.5 260 PET SB 16 29 260 Comp. Ex. 530 0.5 260 PET SB 16 29 260 Comp. Ex. 6 30 0.5 260 PET SB 16 15 260Comp. Ex. 7 30 0.5 260 PET SL 16 29 260 Comp. Ex. 8 30 0.5 260 PET SB 629 260 Comp. Ex. 9 30 0.5 260 PET SB 25 29 260 Comp. Ex. 10 30 0.5 260PET SB 16 2 260 Comp. Ex. 11 30 0.5 260 PET SB 16 20 260 Comp. Ex. 12 300.5 260 PET SB 16 33 260 Comp. Ex. 13 Comp. Ex. 14

TABLE 2 Heat Support substrate bonding conditions Calendering conditionsAdhesion Fiber Apparent Line Temperature Line Temperature Tensile (peelStrike- weight Thickness density pressure (front/back) pressure(front/back) strength strength) through g/m² μm g/cm³ N/cm ° C. N/cm °C. kg/5 cm N/1.5 cm prevention Example 1 70 90 0.78 265 180/180 663236/231 37 1.56 good Example 2 70 90 0.78 265 180/180 663 236/231 371.56 good Example 3 70 90 0.78 265 180/180 663 236/231 34 1.65 goodExample 4 70 90 0.78 265 180/180 663 236/231 31 1.47 good Example 5 7090 0.78 265 180/180 663 236/231 37 1.28 good Example 6 70 90 0.78 265180/180 663 236/231 37 1.74 good Example 7 59 80 0.74 265 180/180 663231/226 34 1.74 good Example 8 57 70 0.81 265 180/180 663 231/226 251.56 good Example 9 70 90 0.78 265 180/180 663 236/231 42 1.74 goodExample 10 70 90 0.78 265 180/180 663 236/231 31 1.56 good Example 11 4460 0.73 265 180/180 663 226/221 25 1.56 good Example 12 60 90 0.67 265180/180 600 236/231 31 1.74 good Example 13 82 90 0.91 265 180/180 730236/231 37 1.10 good Example 14 70 90 0.78 265 180/180 663 236/231 311.56 good Example 15 70 95 0.74 367 225/215 32 1.60 good Example 18 6888 0.77 265 180/180 663 236/231 37 1.56 good Comp. Ex. 1 70 90 0.78 265180/180 663 236/231 15 1.28 poor Comp. Ex. 2 70 90 0.78 265 180/180 663236/231 25 1.10 poor Comp. Ex. 3 70 90 0.78 265 180/180 663 236/231 151.28 poor Comp. Ex. 4 70 90 0.78 265 180/180 663 236/231 37 1.74 poorComp. Ex. 5 58.8 80 0.74 265 180/180 663 231/226 31 1.74 poor Comp. Ex.6 60 90 0.67 265 180/180 663 231/226 15 1.74 good Comp. Ex. 7 70 90 0.78265 180/180 663 236/231 15 1.28 poor Comp. Ex. 8 70 90 0.78 265 180/180663 236/231 34 1.74 poor Comp. Ex. 9 70 90 0.78 265 180/180 663 236/23129 1.74 poor Comp. Ex. 10 64 90 0.71 265 180/180 663 231/226 29 1.65poor Comp. Ex. 11 48 80 0.60 265 180/180 400 236/231 31 1.74 poor Comp.Ex. 12 84 90 0.93 265 180/180 820 236/231 37 0.73 good Comp. Ex. 13 7090 0.78 663 236/231 9 0.55 poor Comp. Ex. 14 70 90 0.78 663 236/231 251.10 poor

TABLE 3 Example 1 Example 16 Front layer Fiber type PET SB PET SB Fiberdiameter (μm) 16 16 Fiber basis weight (g/m²) 29 29 Melting point (° C.)260 260 Middle layer Fiber type PET MB PET MB Fiber diameter (μm) 1.61.6 Fiber basis weight (g/m²) 12 12 Fiber weight ratio (wt %) 17.1 17.1Crystallinity (%) 30 30 Solution viscosity 0.5 0.5 Melting point (° C.)260 260 Back layer Fiber type PET SB PET SB Fiber diameter (μm) 16 16Fiber weight (g/m²) 29 29 Melting point (° C.) 260 260 Support Fiberbasis weight (g/m²) 70 70 substrate Thickness (μm) 90 104 Apparentdensity (g/cm³) 0.78 0.67 Heat bonding Line pressure (N/cm) 265 265conditions Temperature (front/back) 180/180 180/180 (° C.) CalenderingLine pressure (N/cm) 663 570 conditions Temperature (front/back) 236/231231/231 (° C.) Surface roughness SMD (μm) 0.6 1.9 Coating conditionVirtually no Small streaks streaks found infrequently

TABLE 4 Example 1 Example 17 Front layer Fiber type PET SB PET SB Fiberdiameter (μm) 16 16 Fiber basis weight (g/m²) 29 29 Melting point (° C.)260 260 Corona charge (μC/g) 3.0 1.7 Middle layer Fiber type PET MB PETMB Fiber diameter (μm) 1.6 1.6 Fiber basis weight (g/m²) 12 12 Fiberweight ratio (wt %) 17.1 17.1 Crystallinity (%) 30 30 Solution viscosity0.5 0.5 Melting point (° C.) 260 260 Back layer Fiber type PET SB PET SBFiber diameter (μm) 16 16 Fiber basis weight (g/m²) 29 29 Melting point(° C.) 260 260 Corona charge (μC/g) 3.0 1.7 Fiber weight (g/m²) 70 70Thickness (μm) 90 95 Apparent density (g/cm³) 0.78 0.73 Formation index91 115 Strike-through prevention good good

INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY

The separation membrane support substrate of the invention is thin andhas practical strength while also exhibiting excellent strike-throughprevention and resin coating suitability, and can therefore improve theproductivity of separation membranes. In addition, as it allows thenumber of separation membranes per module to be increased, it ispossible to improve the treatment capacity per module, while lengtheningthe usable life and permitting smaller module sizes.

Moreover, as the separation membrane support substrate of the inventionhas high adhesion with coating resins, it can be used for separationmembranes that are subjected to backwash. Consequently, a separationmembrane using a support substrate of the invention has high utilityvalue in a wide range of fields including waste water treatment, waterpurification, seawater desalination, food concentration andpharmaceutical purification.

1-8. (canceled)
 9. A process for production of a separation membranesupport substrate comprising (a) spinning a thermoplastic resin filamenton a conveyor using a thermoplastic resin with a melting point of 180°C. or higher to form at least one nonwoven fabric layer, (b) laminatingat least one layer of fibers with a crystallinity of 15-40% and a fiberdiameter of no greater than 5 μm, composed of a thermoplastic resin witha melting point of 180° C. or higher by melt blowing said fibers oversaid at least one nonwoven fabric layer, (c) laminating to said at leastone layer formed by melt blowing, at least one layer of nonwoven fabricof thermoplastic resin filaments composed of a thermoplastic resin witha melting point of 180° C. or higher, and (d) heat bonding at atemperature of 50-120° C. below the melting point of the thermoplasticresin filaments using a flat roll at a line pressure of 100-1000 N/cm,after which a calender treatment is carried out at a temperature of atleast 10° C. higher than the temperature of said heat bonding and10-100° C. lower than the melting point of the thermoplastic resinfilaments, at a line pressure of 100-1000 N/cm.
 10. A process forproduction of a separation membrane support substrate according to claim9, wherein the thermoplastic resin is a polyester-based resin.